Dismissed
Anita Gupta v. Meena Dudani
Delhi HCEX.P./56/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This execution petition for possession was withdrawn by the decree holder. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to enforce mesne profits.
What did the court decide?
Execution petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to enforce mesne profits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~21
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- EX.P. 56/2019 & E.A.(OS) 1034/2019
¶4
ANITA GUPTA ..... Decree Holder Represented by: Ms. Payal Jain, Advocate.
¶5
versus
¶6
MEENA DUDANI ..... Judgement Debtor Represented by: Mr. Vimal Tiwari, Advocate.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
¶8
O R D E R % 22.01.2020
¶9
- Learned counsel for the decree holder states that decree to the extent of receiving possession of the suit property has been satisfied, however since the judgment debtor did not handover the possession within the time prescribed, the decree holder will be at liberty to enforce its report qua the mense profit. She seeks leave to withdraw the present execution petition.
¶10
- Execution petition and application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the decree holder to take steps for enforcing the mense profit.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
ANITA GUPTA
- respondent
MEENA DUDANI
Coram
AI extract
MUKTA GUPTA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court