Partly allowed

Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Mr. Joseph Sebastian(Alias Joji)

Delhi HC23 Jan 2020CS(COMM)/104/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court decreed the plaintiff's trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's in-court undertaking to abandon use of the trademark, resulting in a permanent injunction and withdrawal of other prayer clauses.

What did the court decide?

Decree passed in terms of prayers (i) and (ii) for permanent injunction; prayers (iii) to (vi) given up by plaintiff.

Exxon Mobil Corporation Vs Mr. Joseph Sebastian(Alias… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2020)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 104/2019

¶4

EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Ms. Anurdha Salhotra and Mr. Mukul Kochhar, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

MR. JOSEPH SEBASTIAN (ALIAS JOJI) ..... Defendant Represented by: Mr. M.T. George, Advocate.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

¶8

O R D E R % 23.01.2020

¶9

The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff-Exxon Mobil Corporation claiming itself to be the owner the trademark ‘EXXON’ registered in its favour in number of classes. The earliest registration of Exxon as a trademark in India being in the year 1967.

¶10

The grievance of the plaintiff is that the defendant had been trading under the name M/s. New Exon Batteries, M/s. New Exon Batteries and Auto Electricals and M/s. New Exon Auto Electricals, thereby infringing the plaintiff’s registered trademark and passing of the goods of the defendant as that of the plaintiff.

¶11

Defendant is present in Court and has handed over an affidavit, which is taken on record. As per the said affidavit, the defendant has already changed the trade name of his proprietorship firm from ‘New Exon CS(COMM) 104/2019 Page 1 of 2

¶12

Batteries’ to ‘Nithin Batteries’ and has also obtained necessary licenses and GST registration in the said new names. Copies of the licenses and registration certificate have also been enclosed therewith.

¶13

The defendant undertakes to suffer a decree of permanent injunction against the use of the mark EXON and EXXON either as a trademark, trade name or corporate name, domain name, email address or in whatsoever manner in respect of his goods and services.

¶14

In view of this undertaking by the defendant, who is also present in Court and identified by the learned counsel, learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the suit be decreed by passing a decree of injunction in terms of prayers (i) and (ii) in the suit and she gives up the prayers (iii), (iv), (v) and (vi) in the suit. Consequently, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of prayers (i) and (ii).

¶15

Since the suit has been decreed at the preliminary stage itself Court fee be returned to the Authorized Representative of the plaintiff under Section 16 A of the Court Fee Act. Registry will issue necessary certificate in this regard.

¶16

IA 2895/2019 (u/O XXXIX R 1 & 2 CPC)

¶17

Application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶18

I.A. 6908/2019 (u/O XXXIX R 2A CPC)

¶19

In view of the undertaking given by the defendant and the unconditional apology tendered, the show cause notice issued to the defendant is discharged.

¶20

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

¶21

JANUARY 23, 2020/ Aj CS(COMM) 104/2019

¶22

Page 2 of 2

Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Mr. Joseph Sebastian(Alias Joji)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Mr. Joseph Sebastian(Alias Joji)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Steelbird Hi-Tech India Ltd. Vs Raj Electricals

Resinova Chemie Limited Vs Sober Formulations Private Limited

Exxon Mobil Corporation Vs Karan Dharmendra Parekh & Anr.

Rohit Bhatia Vs M/S Johar Enterprises

Wicker World LLP Vs Wicker World Furniture & Anr.

Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Free.Newhdmovi.Com & Ors.

M/S Mirza International Ltd. Vs M/S Green Park Shoe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Ritnand Balved Education Foundation Vs Ranchhod M Shah & Ors.

Anita Gupta Vs Meena Dudani

Kanta@Manju Gupta Vs Suresh Mahajan & Ors.

Pooja Vs Sh Narender Kumar & Ors.

Oravel Styas Private Limited Vs Kota Hotels Federation , through President and Ors.

Smt Vinod Kumari Vs Sh Yogender @ Manjeet & Ors.

Wicker World LLP Vs Wicker World Furniture & Anr.