The Court quashed an FIR under IPC Sections 324, 506, and 34 registered for a neighbourhood altercation. The quashing was ordered as the complainant and petitioners confirmed resolution of disputes and absence of further grievances in court.
FIR No.0560/2018 under sections 324/506/34 of the IPC and all consequential proceedings are quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
VINAY KUMAR SAHU & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person.
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with ASI Arvind Kumar, PS New Ashok Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 14.01.2020
CRL.M.A. 527/2020
W.P.(CRL) 83/2020
view of the altercation that had taken place between the petitioners. He confirms that the parties have since resolved their disputes and has no further grievances against them. The petitioners are also present in the Court and state that they have no grievances against the respondent and confirm that all differences and disputes have been resolved.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JANUARY 14, 2020 MK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an FIR under Sections 324/506/34 IPC registered for a neighbourly altercation can be quashed upon settlement of disputes.
Whether the compromise between the petitioners and the complainant warrants the quashing of criminal proceedings.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinay Kumar Sahu & Ors.
State & Anr.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
