Allowed

Shailendra Chandra Pandey & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC14 Jan 2020W.P.(CRL)/82/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge quashed FIR No.0558/2018 and all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. The Court observed that the dispute between neighbouring petitioners and the respondent was resolved through a compromise/settlement deed, with all aggrieved parties present and identified. No grievances were expressed by any party. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0558/2018 registered under Sections 323/354/354(B)/452/34 IPC and all consequential proceedings were quashed.

Shailendra Chandra Pandey & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2020)

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 82/2020

¶4

SHAILENDRA CHANDRA PANDEY & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Piyush Singhal, Advocate for Mr Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with ASI Arvind Kumar, PS New Ashok Nagar.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R

¶9

% 14.01.2020

¶10

CRL.M.A. 526/2020

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 82/2020

¶13

The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia , praying that FIR No.0558/2018 under Sections 323/354/354(B)/452/34 of the IPC registered with PS New Ashok Nagar and all consequential proceedings arising out of the said FIR, be quashed.

¶14

The said FIR was registered at the instance of respondent no.2. Respondent no.2 is present in the Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. The learned counsel appearing for the State states that in addition

¶15

to respondent no.2, there were three other persons who were suffered simple injuries, namely, the husband and two sons of respondent no.2 [Mr Hazari Lal Sahu, husband of respondent no.2; Mr Ankur Sahu and Mr Vinay Kumar Sahu (sons of respondent no.2)]. Mr Hazari Lal Sahu, Mr Ankur Sahu and Mr Vinay Kumar Sahu are also present in the Court and are identified by the Investigating Officer. The said persons (Mr Hazari Lal Sahu, Mr Ankur Sahu and Mr Vinay Kumar Sahu) state that they have resolved their disputes with the petitioners and have also entered into a Compromise/Settlement Deed with them. They state that they have no grievances against the petitioners and request that the FIR in question be quashed.

¶16

The parties are neighbours and the FIR was lodged in view of an altercation that had occurred between the petitioners and respondent no. 2.

¶17

The petitioners are present in the Court and are identified by their counsel. They also state that they have no grievances against respondent no.2 or any of the family members including her husband and her sons.

¶18

In view of the statements made by the concerned parties, this Court considers it apposite to allow the present petition.

¶19

Accordingly, FIR No. 0558/2018 under Sections 323/354/354(B)/452/34 of the IPC registered with PS New Ashok Nagar and all proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.

¶20

The concerned parties (petitioners, respondent no.2, Mr Hazari Lal Sahu, Mr Ankur Sahu and Mr Vinay Kumar Sahu) shall sign this order as an

¶21

acknowledgment of the statements recorded herein.

¶22

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

¶23

JANUARY 14, 2020 MK

Shailendra Chandra Pandey & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailendra Chandra Pandey & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sewak Vs State & Ors.

Pankaj Sharma & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Salim Hussain Vs State ( Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Ashok Kumar Patel Vs State

Shri Ved Prakash Suri & Anr. Vs State & Ors.

Arjun Kumar@ Bittu Vs State of (Nct) Delhi & Ors.

Prakash Chand Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ajay Kumar Vs State & Anr.

Pankaj Sharma & Ors. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Abhimanyu Shah & Anr. Vs State & Anr.

Amit Kumar @ Shaym Singh Vs State

Sartaj Vs State

Kamal Singh Vs State

Vinay Kumar Sahu & Ors. Vs State & Anr.