High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition for want of proper parties being impleaded, granting liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh writ petition with proper parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~13
CAMPAIGN FOR PEOPLE PARTICIPATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Jain, Adv.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing counsel for respondent no. 2 Mr. Nishchaya and Mr. Kush Sharma, Advs. for respondent no. 3 Mr. Anjum Javed, ASC with Mr. Devendra Kumar, Adv. for respondent nos. 4 and 5
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 07.02.2020
It appears that the concerned respondent party, who is liable to demolish the illegal construction, is not impleaded. Hence, we hereby dismiss this petition for want of proper parties to be impleaded with liberty to the petitioner to file afresh writ petition with proper parties, averments, allegations and annexures.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2020 r.bararia
CAMPAIGN FOR PEOPLE PARTICIPATION
UNION OF INDIA
HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
