Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition after a Coordinate Bench rendered it infructuous. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
SMT. TAHIRA BEGUM ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Ritu Puri and Mr.S.N.Jha, Advs.
versus
NAUSHAD KHAN ..... Respondent Through None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R % 06.02.2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the order dated 12.12.2019 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in CM(M) 1016/2019, titled Naushad Khan v. Sir Sobha Singh & Sons (P) Ltd. & Anr., this petition has become infructuous. She prays for leave to withdraw the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2020/Arya
Tahira Begum
Naushad Khan
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
