Dismissed

Olympic Decor LLP v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC17 Feb 2020W.P.(C)/9129/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition for refund of Input Tax Credit. The court did not decide the merits; instead, it directed respondents to decide the pending representation submitted by the petitioner under relevant rules and policies.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to decide the petitioner's representation (Annexure P-6) as per law and policy.

Olympic Decor LLP Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Consumer Protection | Delhi HC (2020)

¶1

$~13

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 17.02.2020

¶4

- W.P.(C) 9129/2019

¶5

OLYMPIC DECOR LLP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sameer Abhayankar, Mr. Akshay Joshi & Mr. Lakshya Sachdeva, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Mr.Ankit Monga, Adv.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶9

JUDGMENT

¶10

D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)

¶11

This petition has been preferred with the following prayers:

¶12

“a. Issue a writ, order or direction of like nature to the Respondents to process and grant the refund of Input Tax Credit available to the Petitioner as per the return filed by the Petitioner in form DVAT 16 for the quarter of F.Y. 2017-18 in the nature of mandamus or any other writ directing the Authorities to refund the Input Tax Credit accrued in favour of the Petitioner herein.

¶13

b. Pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after canvassing some

¶15

W.P.(C) 9129/2019 Page 1 of 2

¶16

arguments, submits that suffice it would be for the disposal of this petition if a suitable direction is given to the respondents to decide the representation of this petitioner which is Annexure P-6 to the memo of this writ petition. In view of this submission, this petition is not being pressed at this stage.

¶17

In view of the above, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the representation of this petitioner which is Annexure P-6 to the memo of this writ petition in accordance with law, rules, regulations and Government policy applicable to the facts of the present case and also keeping in mind the decisions rendered by the competent courts as early as possible and practicable.

¶18

With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is hereby disposed of.

¶19

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶20

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 17, 2020 ns

¶22

W.P.(C) 9129/2019 Page 2 of 2

Olympic Decor LLP v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Olympic Decor LLP v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jindal Public School Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs East Delhi Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Non Government Educational Institutions Directors Association Vs Union of India and Anr.

Sh. Bharat Bhushan Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Devender Singh & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ajay Verma Vs Govt.of NCT of Delhi

Vedpal & Anr. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Prashant Manchanda Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mahender Singh Sekhawat Vs Union of India and Ors.

Courts on Its Own Motion Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Anuj Kumar Chauhan Vs Lieutenant Governor Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.

M/S S. C. Padhee Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ajay Gautam Vs High Court of Delhi and Ors.

Baba Narayan Dass Shikshasamiti Khatodra Mahendergarh & Anr. Vs Sanjay Awasthi , Irs , Member Secretary , National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.