The Court directed the respondents to continue complying with the individual guidelines and directions issued by this Court in orders dated 15th December, 2017 and 8th March, 2018. The Constitutional bench also disposed of the connected CM application as it was not pressed at that stage by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
Date of decision: 18th February, 2020
AJAY VERMA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person with Ms. Katyayini, Adv.
versus
GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gautam Narayan, Addl.Standing Counsel-GNCTD Mr. Rajat Aneja and Mr. Kartik K. Sood, Advs. for Delhi High Court
Mr. Sumer Sethi and Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advs. for Delhi State Legal Services Authority
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 18.02.2020
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
W.P.(C) 10689/2017 and CM No. 23042/2018
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 10689/2017
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 18, 2020/ kr
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 10689/2017
Ajay Verma
Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi
D.N. Patel
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
