Petitioner appearing in person applied to withdraw a writ petition citing technical defects. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh one.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MS. K. R. CHITRA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. versus
SECRETARY GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mrs.Arti Bansal, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 06.02.2020
Petitioner who appears in person submits that there are certain technical defects in the petition and accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed
for.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
FEBRUARY 06, 2020 rk
Ms. K. R. Chitra
Secretary General, Supreme Court of India
Sanjeev Sachdeva
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
