High Court of Delhi disposed of W.P.(C) 546/2020 and connected stay applications. The Court declined interference while the inquiry was underway but kept grounds available for future use. The petition and applications were dismissed.
The petition is dismissed. The pending applications are also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
ARVIND KUMAR MEWARAM LAKHORIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Chauhan, Advocate.
versus
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Vipin Chaudhary, Advocates for Railways.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R % 15.01.2020
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
JANUARY 15, 2020/ nk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere with the proceedings during the pendency of an inquiry.
Whether the present writ petition maintained grounds for interference.
Arvind Kumar Mewaram Lakhoria
Ministry of Railways
S.Muralidhar
Talwant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
