This order disposes of a petition regarding the absorption of the petitioner as a Law Officer in the BSF, disposing of an earlier petition's prayer after granting liberty to challenge specific clauses.
Liberty granted to counsel to challenge specific paragraphs of an order in a connected petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
SATYA DEV YADAV ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate for Respondent/UOI Mr. Kavindra Gill, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2 Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC for Respondent
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 14.01.2020
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
JANUARY 14, 2020 mw
SATYA DEV YADAV
UNION OF INDIA
ANR
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
