The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~A-23
M/S AKM MEHRASONS JEWELLERS ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Shekhar Budakoti, Adv.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for SDMC with Ms.Komal Sorout, Ms.Kajri Gupta and Ms.Shweta, Advs. Mr.Anand Mishra and Ms.Sakhi Jain, Advs. for R- 3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH
%
O R D E R 04.02.2020
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application also stands dismissed.
JAYANT NATH, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020/rb
M/S AKM MEHRASONS JEWELLERS
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
JAYANT NATH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
