PIL seeking direction to construct Fruit and Vegetable Market at Tikri Kalan. Court observed construction processes have started and directed completion as early as possible.
Directed respondents to complete the fruit and vegetable market at Tikri Kalan as early as possible and practicable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
Date of decision: 11th February, 2020
HARPAL SINGH RANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma, Adv.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR...... Respondents Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Addl.Standing Counsel-GNCTD with Ms. Divya Joshi, Adv. for R-1 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel-DAMB with Mr. N.K. Singh, Adv. for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 11.02.2020
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
W.P.(C) 2011/2018
Page 1 of 3
W.P.(C) 2011/2018
“1. Writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents thereby directing the respondents to commence and complete the construction of the project of construction of the Fruit and Vegetable Market at Tikri Kalan and to close the operations of the existing Subzi Mandi at Azadpur at the earliest.
II. Any other order which the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case be also passed in favour of the petitioner.”
Page 2 of 3
W.P.(C) 2011/2018
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 11, 2020/ kr
Page 3 of 3
W.P.(C) 2011/2018
Harpal Singh Rana
Government of NCT of Delhi
Anon
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
