an application for withdrawal of the writ petition was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
application for withdrawal allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ankit Tandan & Mr.Vishav Kamal, Advs.
versus
GOVT. OF DELHI AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Ms.Sangita Rai & Mr.Pradeep Tomar, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Parvinder Chauhan, SC/DUSIB with Mr.Rahul Adhana, Adv. for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 10.02.2020
CM APPL. 5272/2020
This is an application seeking withdrawal of the present petition. The application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2020 /rv
Mr. Pravin Kumar
Govt. of Delhi
ANR
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
