The High Court of Delhi allowed petitions seeking pro rata pension benefits for former service members. Directing respondents to verify details and pay arrears within 12 weeks, the court ordered a 6% simple interest penalty for delays.
Direction to grant pro rata pension upon verification and pay arrears within 12 weeks with 6% simple interest on delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1514/2020
AWADHESH KUMAR .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Amit Mehta, Government Pleader.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5237/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1514/2020
Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
$~65
NAKUL CHANDRA BEHERA .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yashish Chandra, Senior Panel Counsel and Rupal Kapoor, Government Pleader.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5378/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1541/2020
11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
$~66
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1543/2020
MANDAL BAYTULLA .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Syed Adil Taqvi and Ms. Naghma Siddiqui, Advocates.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5380/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1543/2020
11th December, 2019 in W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019 (Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
$~71
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1607/2020
RAJ KUMAR YADAV .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5641/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1607/2020
Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
$~78
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1637/2020
AKHILESHWAR TIWARI
.... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manoj Kr. Gupta and Mr. Banvendra Singh Gandhar, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5744/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1637/2020
Union of India) and the decision dated 15th January, 2020 in W.P. (C) 9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
$~73
NIRAJ KUMAR RANJAN .... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Harish V. Shankar, CGSC with Ms. Gulabsa, Advocate.
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2020
CM APPL. 5644/2020 (Exemption)
W.P.(C) 1609/2020
9524/2019 (Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India) .
S.MURALIDHAR, J.
TALWANT SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2020 abc
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pro rata pension upon verification of details.
Whether the Respondent is directed to pay arrears of pension within a specified period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of IndiaApplied¶3
W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016
Mohammad Israr Khan v. Union of IndiaApplied¶3
W.P.(C) No. 5642/2019
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of IndiaApplied¶3
W.P. (C) 9524/2019
AWADHESH KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
