Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the petition, dismissing it with liberty to raise objections before the Adjudicating Authority.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise objections before the Adjudicating Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
SHRI GURMUKHDAS CONTRACTORS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.V.Govinda Ramanan, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Bharathi Raju, CGSC for R-1.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R % 07.02.2020 CMs 5156-57/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
WP(C) 1484/2020 & CM 5155/2020
The learned counsel for the petitioners prays for leave to withdraw the present petition.
The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise all objections before the Adjudicating Authority.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2020 RN
SHRI GURMUKHDAS CONTRACTORS PVT LTD & ANR
UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
