Applications filed under W.P.(C) 1450/2020 and CM APPL. 5014/2020 were disposed of. Solemn exemption was granted under CM APPL. 5015/2020. The withdrawal petition was allowed with liberty to file afresh.
Exemption allowed in CM application; Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
PACIFIC PROJECTS LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Rano Jain and Mr. Venketesh Chaurasia, Advs.
versus
ASSTT CIT, CIR-19(2), ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing counsel with Mr.Shrey Nargotra and Mr. Parth Semwal, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 07.02.2020
CM APPL. 5015/2020 (exemption)
W.P.(C) 1450/2020, CM APPL. 5014/2020
VIPIN SANGHI, J
SANJEEV NARULA, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2020 Pallavi
PACIFIC PROJECTS LTD
ASSTT CIT, CIR-19(2)
VIPIN SANGHI
SANJEEV NARULA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
