The petitioners requested disposal of the petition in terms of the judgment in Mukut Pathak v. Union of India. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Abdesh Chaudhary, Mr.Ashish Pandey, Ms.Sakshi Arora & Mr.Akshat Gupta, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
..... Respondents Through: proxy counsel.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 06.01.2020
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if this petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 04.11.2019, passed in a batch of petitions including WP(C) 9088/2018, titled Mukut Pathak & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
It is ordered accordingly.
The petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned judgment.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 06, 2020/ rv
Jyoti Bansal and Ors.
Union of India and Ors.
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
