The petition was rendered infructuous as foreign and local currency seized from the petitioner were released. The court accepted the withdrawal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
versus
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Gagan Vaswani, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the respondent has released the Indian and foreign currency seized from the petitioner, the petition has been rendered infructuous and he has instructions to withdraw the same.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 06, 2020 RN
KANIKA TOURS AND TRAVELS PVT. LTD.
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
