Petitioner sought aid for a drug. Court brought action to dispose of due to approval by the Committee. Requested consideration for reimbursement.
Consideration for reimbursement of already purchased drug if eligible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
SH. DURGA SHANKAR AMIST ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Nikhil Borwankar, Mr.A.Verma, Mr.David Thomas, Mr.Shimona Ghose, Mr.Akshay Nain, Advs.
versus
DR. DINESH CHANDRA JOSHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sididharth Khatana, Sr. Panel Counsel alongwith Dr. Jagmohan, CMO
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R D E R
% 10.02.2020
This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking financial aid for purchase of the drug ‘Venetoclax’ and reimbursement for purchases already made.
The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the Committee has approved the purchase of the drug for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of.
As far as the claim of the reimbursement for purchases already
made, the respondents shall also consider the same and if the petitioner is eligible, release the same expeditiously.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
FEBRUARY 10, 2020 RN
Sh. Durga Shankar Amist
Dr. Dinesh Chandra Joshi
Navin Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
