This order directed the deposit of Rs. 40,000/- already permitted for deposition in 2002 with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee after respondents expired and petitioner submitted a no objection certificate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
ASHIM KHURANA ..... Petitioner
Through: None. versus
THE STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Avinash Sharma and Mr. Madhav Dadhich, Advocates for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R
%
11.03.2019
The application stands disposed of.”
also to the counsel contesting the matter when the judgment was passed on 11th July 1997.
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MARCH 11, 2019 nk
Ashim Khurana
The State
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
