Mohd Ismail v. Saeeduddin

$~22

*** IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI**

% Judgment delivered on: 07.11.2019 + RC.REV. 117/2018 & & CM APPL. 12178/2018

MOHD ISMAIL ..... Petitioner versus SAEEDUDDIN ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Davinder Kr. Rajora and Mr. Ashok Anand, Advocates with respondent in person.

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 02.02.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.

1. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with regard to four shops in property bearing No. 3196-98 situated at Kucha Pandit, Hamdard Marg, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in