Rajiv Shram v. Ndmc and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought refund of Earnest Money Deposit. Respondent claimed misplacement of draft but stated bank credited amount to solicitors' account. Petitioner withdrew petition.
What the court decided
$~3
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(C) 7521/2019 & CM APPL. 31313/2019
RAJIV SHRAM
..... Petitioner
Through Mr. A.S. M. Tripathi & Auja Shukla, Advocates
versus
NDMC AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anil Grover, Standing Counsel and Mr. Ashok Kr. Sharma, Addl. Standing Counsel with Mr. Mishal Vij, Advocate for NDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA O R D E R % 06.11.2019
Petitioner by this petition seeks a direction to the Respondents to refund the Earnest Money Deposit of Rs. 5,000/- submitted alongwith his bid.
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the earnest money deposited had been furnished by way of demand draft and since demand draft got misplaced in the office of the NDMC, the same was never deposited and the NDMC never received money.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajiv Shram
- respondent
NDMC
Coram
Sanjeev Sachdeva
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court