Dismissed

Anjali College of Pharmacy & Science v. All India Council for Technical Education

Delhi HC14 Oct 2019LPA/659/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An Letters Patent Appeal was filed to challenge an order of the Single Judge that issued a notice in a pending writ petition regarding alleged fee charges. The court held that since no merits were decided and the writ petition remained pending, the appeal was dismissed as having no value.

What did the court decide?

The Letters Patent Appeal and pending application were dismissed.

Anjali College of Pharmacy & Science Vs All India… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~30

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

Date of Decision: 14.10.2019

¶4

- LPA 659/2019 & CM APPLs. 44989/2019 & 44990/2019

¶5

ANJALI COLLEGE OF PHARMACY & SCIENCE

¶6

..... Appellant Through: Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv.

¶7

versus

¶8

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION

¶9

..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anil Soni, Standing Counsel, AICTE with Mr. Devesh Dubey, Adv.

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR

¶11

D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)

¶12

CM APPL. 44990/2019 (exemption)

¶13

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶14

LPA 659/2019 & CM APPL. 44989/2019

¶15

This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the appellant (original petitioner) whose W.P.(C) No.10486/2019 along with stay application is pending before the learned Single Judge and the interim order has been passed issuing notice on 27.09.2019.

¶16

As the appellant (original petitioner) is in search of ex parte ad interim relief which was not granted by the learned Single Judge and as the learned Single Judge has issued notice vide order dated 27.09.2019, this Letters

¶17

LPA No.659/2019 Page 1 of 2

¶18

Patent Appeal has been preferred.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that only against the issuance of the notice, the present Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred. No rights and liabilities of the parties have been decided by the learned Single Judge.

¶20

Much has been argued out by the counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) about the merits of the case and about the allegations of charging higher fees by the appellant Institution from the students of B. Pharmacy faculty. Earlier, a writ petition has also been preferred i.e. W.P.(C) No.9144/2019 and disposed of vide order dated 26.08.2019 (At Page No.41 of this Letters Patent Appeal).

¶21

As the writ petition as well as stay application is pending, we are not entering into the merits of the case, otherwise there will be nothing left to be decided by the learned Single Judge.

¶22

Suffice would it be to say that looking to the order of the learned Single Judge dated 27.09.2019, notice has been issued. Hence, against that order, we see no reason to entertain this Letters Patent Appeal and the same is therefore dismissed. The pending application also stands disposed of accordingly.

¶23

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶24

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶25

OCTOBER 14, 2019 kks

¶26

LPA No.659/2019 Page

¶27

2 of 2

Anjali College of Pharmacy & Science v. All India Council for Technical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anjali College of Pharmacy & Science v. All India Council for Technical Education

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bindia Chhabra Vs South Delhi Municipalcorporation

Center of Applied Politics Vs Govt of India & Anr.

Suresh Chand Goel & Sons (Huf) & Anr. Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Aban Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs Prinicipal Commissioner of Customs (Export) and Ors.

Sri Jee Moulding and Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.

M/S Arihant Marketing Vs Commissioner, Trade and Taxes and Anr.