This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 14.10.2019
SRI JEE MOULDING AND PACKAGING PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, proxy counsel for Mr. Arif Khan, Adv.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Hafsa Khan, Adv. for respondents.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the grievances ventilated in this petition have been brought to an end and the refund amount under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 has already been paid by the respondent to the petitioner.
In view of this limited submission, this writ petition is disposed of as not pressed at this stage.
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
OCTOBER 14, 2019/kks
SRI JEE MOULDING AND PACKAGING PVT. LTD.
THE COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
