The High Court of Delhi decreed a civil suit based on a recording of settlement reached through mediation between the parties. An interim order was vacated due to the settlement.
Decree passed in terms of the settlement agreement dated 14th February, 2019; interim orders vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-31
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SH. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Atul Kumar, Advocate with plaintiffs in person
versus
SMT. SHASHI JAIN ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Vinay Gautam, Advocate along with defendant in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
O R D E R % 18.02.2019
CS(OS) 476/2018 & I.A. 2506/2019
I.A. 13136/2018
J.R. MIDHA, J.
FEBRUARY 18, 2019 ds
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to record the settlement agreement and pass a decree in terms thereof.
,
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Kumar Jain & Anr.
Shashi Jain
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
