A compromise decree in a suit for permanent injunction and ancillary relief concerning trademark infringement and passing off, settled under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and passed on January 15, 2019.
Compromise application allowed; decree passed in favour of plaintiff based on terms of settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
O R D E R
CS(COMM) 774/2016
Page 1 of 2
(ii) a decree is passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of the settlement arrived at and contained in IA No.477/2019 which shall form part of the decree sheet.
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J
JANUARY 15, 2019 „gsr‟..
CS(COMM) 774/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
