Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi HCCRL.A./922/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Delhi listed consecutive criminal appeals and related matters for the state to argue. Arguments for appellants were concluded with a request for written submissions; state arguments were scheduled for later.
What the court decided
AI extract
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
$~36 to 42
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 922/2017 RAJ KUMAR ..... Appellant Represented by: Presence not given. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. + CRL.A. 950/2017 SATISH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Himanshu Buttan, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. + CRL.A. 976/2017 ISLAM ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. + CRL.A. 980/2017 MOHD ZAIKI ..... Appellant CRL.A. 922/201 and conn. matters page 1 of 3
¶4
Represented by: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate.
¶5
| versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: |
..... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. |
|---|---|
| + CRL.A. 1109/2017 SUNIL KUMAR Represented by: |
..... Appellant Mr. Avinash, Advocate for Mr. Aditya Vikram, DHCLSC. |
| versus | |
| STATE Represented by: |
..... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. |
| + CRL.A. 1183/2017 RAJENDER Represented by: |
..... Appellant Mr. S.S. Handa and Mr. Shiva Handa, Advocates. |
| versus | |
| THE STATE GOVT OF NCT Represented by: + CRL.A. 104/2018 PARVEEN GOEL Represented by: |
OF DELHI ..... Respondent Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Neel Prakash, PS S.B. Dairy. ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. |
| CRL.A. 922/201 and conn. matters | page 2 of 3 |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Raj Kumar
- appellant
Satish
- appellant
Islam
- appellant
Mohd Zaiki
- appellant
Sunil Kumar
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court