Allowed

Jasbir Singh v. State

Delhi HC4 Jul 2019BAIL APPLN./1474/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to Jasbir Singh in two FIRs relating to cheating, forgery, and property offences. The petitioner had been in custody since August 2019, and the court deemed it fit to release him on a personal bond considering the lengthy trial and pending forensic reports.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was released on bail on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 in each of the two FIRs with one surety per FIR, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

Jasbir Singh Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:14.10.2024 16:28 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.

¶2

and FIR No.317/2017 under Sections . 454/448/511/365/380/387/ 419/420/467/471/468/34 IPG.

¶3

The allegations against the petitioner in FIR No.317/2017 registered at PS Maurya Enclave relating to Bail Appn.No. 1475/2019 are that one Mohit Sachdeva complained that on the morning of 30^*^ July, 2017, he received a call from a family friend stating that somebody has broken locks of the gate of his property at DU-13, Pitam Pura and tried to trespass. 1^, Despite the fact that two guards were at the gate, they were forcibly driven far off in a car, forced and pushed by two people and later the guards were dropped far off. The complainant and his brother reached the spot where they saw 10-12 people led by a lady taking out some of their belongings . lying there with the intention to trespass the property. While leaving, they saw that the trespassers had put two boards, one of Advocate namely Avinash Pandey on the walls of the property. When the police reached the spot they left the spot.

¶4

During investigation it was revealed that Ranjeet Kaur, the lady in front had prepared forged documents of the said property and on the strength of those forged document sold the same to Gurpreet Kaur, wife of Manu Behl. Despite efforts, Ranjeet Kaur could not be arrested and non-bailable warrants were issued against her and later she was declared a proclaimed offender. The petitioner came into picture in the said FIR for the reason electricity and telephone bills of the said property had been changed to the name of the petitioner namely Jasbir Singh, son of Amarjeet Singh. It was again revealed that on the strength of one document i.e. GPA of the property of the complainant, the amendments were carried out. The signatures on the bail APPLN. 1474/2019

¶5

page 2 of4

¶6

documents pursuant whereto electricity and telephone bills were changed into the name of the petitioner have been sent to FSL and the report thereon is still awaited.

¶7

While investigation in FIR No.3I7/2017 registered at PS Mauiya Enclave going on, another complaint was received on which FIR No.402/2018 was registered on ll'" October, 2018 under Sections 420/34 IPG at PS Mauiya Enclave. The complainant Pravesh Kumar Garg in the said complaint stated that the petitioner in connivance with Pawan Kundra agreed to part with the ownership of the property in consideration whereof a sum of Rs,26,00„000/- was transferred by way of a cheque to the petitioner's account and Rs.49,30,000/- was given in , cash though the complainant therein could not show any receipts of the cash amounts. In the ittteiregnum one FIR No.75/2018 was aiso registered at PS Janipur, Jammu under Sections 4I9/420/467/468/120-B/34 IPG on the complaint of Mohit Sachdeva. FSL Report in FIR No.402/2018 registered at PS Mauiya Enclave is also awaited. 5. The petitioner is in custody since 25'" August, 2018. Necessaiy documents have been collected and sent to the FSL. Investigation from the petitioner has already been conducted. 6. Gonsidering the fact that the petitioner has been in custody now for nearly 11 months and the trial is likely to take sometime, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioner be released on bail in the abovenoted two FIRs, on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- in each of the case with one surety in each of the FIR subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. It is further bail APPLN. 1474/2019 page 3 of4

¶8

¶9

clarified that the petitioner will not leave the country without the prior permission of the Court concerned and in case of change of residential address, the same will be intimated to the Court concerned by way of an affidavit.

¶10

Petitions and applications are disposed of.

¶11

Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

JULY 04, 2019

mamta

BAIL APPLN. 1474/2019

¶18

page 4 of 4

Jasbir Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jasbir Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deep Singh @ Deepla @ Deepak Vs State

Preetam @ Shrikaran Vs State & Anr.

Kawaljeet Singh Vs State

Suresh Yadav Vs Anil @ Monu & Ors.

Jasbir Singh Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Raj Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi