Allowed

Sudesh Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC15 Feb 2019CRL.M.C./854/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR under IPC Sections 498-A, 406, and 34. The court considered a settlement agreement where the petitioner paid the balance amount, concluding no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing criminal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0010/2018 and all consequential proceedings under IPC Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 are quashed.

Sudesh Sharma & Ors. Vs State & Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Delhi HC (2019)

¶1

$~27

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 854/2019 & CRL.M.A.3426/2019

¶4

SUDESH SHARMA & ORS .... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Sagar Hajela and Mr.Rishabh Singh, Advs. with the petitioners in person

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE & ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP with IO Birendra Singh, PS Chhawala, Delhi Mr. Narender Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R

¶9

% 15.02.2019

¶10

CRL.M.A. 3426/2019 (for exemption)

¶11

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

¶12

CRL.M.C. 854/2019

¶13

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.0010/2018 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered at Police Station Chhawala, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

¶14

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned

¶15

counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have entered into a Memorandum of Settlement dated 11.07.2018 in pursuance whereof, the marriage of petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 has been dissolved vide a decree of divorce dated 13.12.2018.

¶16

The Investigating Officer (‘IO’), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 4. The petitioners and the respondent No.2, present in the Court, stated that the settlement was arrived at between the parties on their own free will, without any force, pressure or coercion, in terms whereof the petitioners have to pay the balance amount of Rs.50,000/to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 submitted that in case the petitioners make the balance payment of Rs.50,000/- in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, she has no objection to the petition being allowed and quashing of the FIR.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have brought a Demand Draft bearing No.083413 dated 14.02.2019 for an amount of Rs.50,000/- which has been handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court. The parties submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount as well as in the interest of justice, the aforesaid petition may be allowed.

¶18

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR

¶19

No.0010/2018 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Chhawala, New Delhi and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR are quashed.

¶20

Petition is disposed of in above terms.

¶21

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J

¶22

FEBRUARY 15, 2019/rk

Sudesh Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudesh Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Tripathi Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Ritesh Jindal & Anr. Vs Kanta Devi

Manoj Kumar & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Tapan & Ors. Vs State & Ors.

Sh. Dinesh Vs State

Gagan Kharbanda Vs the State of Delhi & Ors.