This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SONATA PARASHAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Narayan, Mr. Jusharjeet Singh and Ms. Shikha Khurana, Advs. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Javed Akhtar, Adv. for Standing Counsel. Mr. Sunil Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for R/Mr. Tushar Goyal
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R % 04.02.2020
Crl. M.A.1973/2020 (for direction)
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the application.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
FEBRUARY 04, 2020 ib
Sonata Parashar
State & Anr.
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
