This court exercised powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR under Sections 354, 509, 323, and 34 IPC. The petition was allowed as the parties had settled their dispute via a deed, verified by the Investigating Officer, and the deposit amount was paid in court.
FIR No. 288/2013 and proceedings therefrom registered at P.S. Tilak Nagar were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate for R-2
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 09.12.2019
petition being allowed and the FIR being quashed in case the petitioners pay the balance amount of Rs.35,000/- to her, which is required to be paid as per the settlement arrived at between the parties.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
DECEMBER 09, 2019 Aj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings should be quashed in light of a settlement arrived at between the parties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Veena Sharma
State
Respondent No.2
Chander Shekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
