This court quashed an FIR under sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a settlement between the parties. The petitioners paid the outstanding consideration amount, and the court found that criminal proceedings no longer served any fruitful purpose.
FIR No.395/2015 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings therefrom were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
SH. ROHIT @ DILIP KUMAR KARNDHAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra and Ms.Archana Mishra, Advs. with the petitioner in person versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SI Jagdish R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 06.12.2019
CRL.M.A. 37297/2019 and 42114/2019 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of.
CRL.M.A. 42113/2019 (for impleadment)
In view of the cause submitted in the application, the application is allowed and applicant is impleaded as one of the petitioners. Amended memo of parties filed with the application is taken on record.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 4994/2019
and the FIR may be quashed.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
DECEMBER 06, 2019 AK
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR and proceedings under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC should be quashed in view of the settlement between the parties.
Whether the quashing of the FIR is permissible after the parties have settled disputes and divorce has been decreed.
Whether the balance consideration amount of Rs.68,000/- was duly paid to the respondent.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SH. ROHIT @ DILIP KUMAR KARNDHAR & ORS.
STATE
CHANDER SHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
