Mohd. Irshad v. Stat & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking bail with leave granted. The miscellaneous application was disposed of as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; miscellaneous application disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- W.P.(CRL) 28/2019 & CRL.M.A. 178/2019 MOHD. IRSHAD ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Pankaj Srivastava, Advocate versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rahul Mehra, SC (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for the State SI Ram Naresh, PS Amar Colony Mr. Sanjay Kumar with Ms. Kalpna Devi, Advocates for respondents No.3 & 4
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 08.01.2019 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate court for filing a fresh application for grant of bail, which may be considered in accordance with law.
- The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with leave granted as prayed for.
- Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
HIMA KOHLI, J
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
JANUARY 08, 2019/ sm/j
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHD. IRSHAD
- respondent
STATE & ORS.
Coram
HIMA KOHLI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court