Petitioners sought protection from threat to life. Court disposed of the petition and interim application as the counsel for the petitioner did not press these matters after the State provided contact details of police officials.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~16
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI O R D E R % 16.10.2019
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have threat to life from respondents No.2 to 4 and they seek protection.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State submits that mobile numbers of Beat Constable, SHO concerned and a woman ASI have been provided to petitioners so that they can contact them in case of exigency.
In view of aforesaid, learned counsel for petitioners does not press this petition.
This petition and the application for interim relief stand disposed of as not pressed.
BRIJESH SETHI, J
OCTOBER 16, 2019 AP
Shivani & Anr.
State & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
