Prince Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
This order grants anticipatory bail to Prince Kumar in FIR 325/2017 involving cheating and forgery, noting the dispute was amicably resolved. Bail is admitted subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with a local surety.
What did the court decide?
Admission to bail subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety.
What the court decided
$~2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 1198/2019 & Crl.M.A. 10158/2019
PRINCE KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Joshi & Mr. Ambareen, Advocates with petitioner in person
Versus
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Inderpal Singh Mr. J.K. Chawla, Advocate with complainant in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI
O R D E R
% 15.10.2019
Vide this petition, petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 325/2017, under Sections 420/406/120B IPC, registered at police station Madhu Vihar, Delhi.
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the subject matter of dispute has been amicably resolved between the parties and complete payment has been made to the complainant.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner in anticipation of arrest.
Whether the parties' settlement affects the bail application proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prince Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court