Dismissed
Rishikesh Poddar v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(CRL)/5/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
RISHIKESH PODDAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.P.Tripathi, Advocate with Petitioner in person
versus
STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State with Ms.Amita Sachdeva, Advocate and ASI Anita, PS Ranhola Mr.Dikshant Khanna, Advocate for the complainant with Complainant in person
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
Crl.M.A.No.22/2019
W.P.(Crl.) No.5/2019 & Crl.M.A.No.23/201 9
Investigating Officer, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
JANUARY 07, 2019 mamta
RISHIKESH PODDAR
STATE & ANR.
MUKTA GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court