The High Court of Delhi quashed an FIR and related proceedings upon the petitioner entering a settlement deed with the complainant, involving payment of money, confirming the compromise was voluntary.
Quashed FIR No. 992/2006 and proceedings therefrom, subject to petitioner paying Rs. 10,000 costs to Delhi Police Martyr's Fund.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~19
RUCHI SINGH BEDI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammed, Adv. with Mr. Ravindra Vikram, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Kumar Ghai, APP for State. SI Yogesh Tanwar, PS Kalkaji. Mr. Anil Vyas, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 12.03.2019
amount of Rs. 75,000/- has been handed over to the learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 by the learned counsel for the petitioner in Court today, a copy whereof is hereby taken on record.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
MARCH 12, 2019 j
page 2of 2
CRL.M.C. 1329/2018
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings should be quashed in light of a settlement deed entered into by the parties.
Ruchi Singh Bedi
State Govt of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No.2
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
