Dismissed
Haseena & Ors. v. Mubina Begum
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/232/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
None.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~15
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 232/2014
¶4
HASEENA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: None.
¶5
versus
¶6
MUBINA BEGUM ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
¶8
O R D E R % 21.01.2019
¶9
Despite the matter being passed over twice, there is no appearance on behalf of either of the parties. The parties have also not appeared on 14.09.2017 and 26.04.2018. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the petition.
¶10
The petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
¶11
VINOD GOEL, J. JANUARY 21, 2019
¶12
“shailendra”
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Haseena & Ors.
- respondent
Mubina Begum
Coram
AI extract
Vinod Goel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court