This order dismissed a writ petition as infructuous. The court held that since a prior order in OMP 1106/2012 already addressed the prayer for deposit of awarded amounts in Court, the current petition had no remaining legal basis.
None; petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDITS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K. Dutta and Mr. Simran Mehta, Advocates (M: 9891137150).
versus
VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, Advocate (M: 9810613470).
CORAM:
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Mr. K. Dutta, Advocate submits that the present petition is infructuous as the prayer in the petition was for deposit of the awarded amount in Court.
In view of the order passed in OMP 1106/2012, the present petition is infructuous.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2019 MR
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition is maintainable given that a prior order rendered the prayer infructuous?
MORGAN SECURITIES AND CREDITS PVT. LTD.
VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
