Gurdev v. Raj Bala
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against dismissal of application for production of documents under Order XI Rules 12 and 14 CPC. High Court held appeal without merit as respondent admitted possession of relevant documents during cross-examination.
What did the court decide?
Application under Order XI Rules 12 & 14 CPC pending against the appeal stands disposed of.
What the court decided
$~54
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 708/2019 GURDEV
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Jay Savla, Senior Advocate with Ms.Shilpi Choudhary, Mr.Rajpal, Advocates.
versus
RAJ BALA
..... Respondent Through : Mr.Aditya Jain, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA
O R D E R % 07.05.2019 CAV No.486/2019
Counsel as above appears for the respondent/caveator.
The caveat is discharged.
CM APPL Nos.21707-08/2019
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal challenging the trial court's dismissal of the application for production of documents under Order XI Rules 12 and 14 CPC has merit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Gurdev
- respondent
Raj Bala
Coram
Yogesh Khanna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court