The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition as withdrawn. The petitioner, represented by counsel, stated that the payment had been received by the decree holder and intended to withdraw the petition. Pending applications were also disposed of.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Rajesh Rai and Mr.Rishi Kumar, Advocates
versus
TARA CHAND
..... Respondent Through : None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA O R D E R % 08.05.2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner says the payment has been received by the decree holder and nothing survives in this petition and hence intend to withdraw the petition.
The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, is also disposed of.
YOGESH KHANNA, J.
MAY 08, 2019
VLD
Rajesh Kumar
Tara Chand
Yogesh Khanna
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
