Justice Anu Malhotra disposed of an exemption application allowing it subject to exceptions and dismissed a separate petition as withdrawn while granting liberty to seek redressal under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Exemption allowed subject to exceptions; withdrawal petition dismissed with liberty to seek redressal under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
DR EKTA AGARWAL ..... Petitioner
versus
AVDHESH GOEL ..... Respondent Through
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 241/2019 & CM APPL. 6579/2019
After some initial submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition seeking liberty to seek redressal under Order VII Rule 10 of the CPC.
The present petition is thus dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted as prayed.
ANU MALHOTRA, J
FEBRUARY 14, 2019 vm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant exemption under Order VII Rule 10 CPC with liberty to withdraw or proceed.
Ekta Agarwal
Awdhesh Goel
Anu Malhotra
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
