MD Rafeeq , Prop v. M/S Idara Impex
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court set aside an order closing the right to file a written statement due to delay, allowing the filing subject to condonation with costs.
What did the court decide?
The impugned order closing the right to file the written statement was set aside. The written statement is directed to be taken on record. The petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.10,000/-.
What the court decided
$~61
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CM(M) 1569/2018 & CM APPL. 53270/2018
- MD RAFEEQ , PROP ..... Petitioner
- Through: Mr. Ajit Singh, Adv.
versus
M/S IDARA IMPEX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Mukhija, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
O R D E R
- % 15.02.2019
Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 06.09.2017 of the learned trial Court of the ASCJ (Central) in CS No.2280/17 vide which the right to file the written statement of the defendant i.e. the petitioner herein was closed in as much as the said written statement had not been filed within the stipulated period of time.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order closing the right to file the written statement should be set aside to allow the delayed filing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MD RAFEEQ
- respondent
M/S IDARA IMPEX
Coram
ANU MALHOTRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court