The High Court granted the petitioners permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Consequently, no further orders were required for the connected application, and both matters were disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
Date of Decision: 07.11.2019
Through: Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satyendra Kumar, SCGC for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
W.P.(C) 9425/2019
CM APPL. 38785/2019
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2019/kks
MOHD. SERAJ ANSARI AND ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
