Writ petition seeking a refund under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act was disposed of as infructuous because the respondent had already passed a refund order on 11.09.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 07.11.2019
versus
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Hafsa Khan, Adv. for respondent.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (Oral)
W.P.(C) 7657/2019 Page 1 of 2
CHIEF JUSTICE
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
NOVEMBER 07, 2019 kks
2 of 2
W.P.(C) 7657/2019 Page
VRC CONSTRUCTIONS (I) PVT. LTD.
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES
D.N. PATEL
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
