Single-judge order dismissing WRIT PETITION (C) 8726/2017 against decision in Aasma Mohammed Farooq case, leaving approach open but extending interim attachment order by six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
M/S SWASTIK CEMENT PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.
& ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Ms Mallika Hiremath, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 11.04.2019
interim order passed in the present petition shall continue for a further period of six weeks from today.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
APRIL 11, 2019 MK
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Aasma Mohammed Farooq & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.Referred¶13
Aasma Mohammed Farooq & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.:W.P.(C) 12494/2018 decided on 05.12.2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S SWASTIK CEMENT PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
