Dismissed as an interim order directing issue of notice to respondents.
Issue fresh notice to respondents within one week; file counter affidavits with advance copy and allow rejoinder within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
NAMRATA SOLANKI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Adv. (Govt.) for R-1 with Mr. Hem Kumar, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 10.01.2019
The office report states that issue could not be issued for want of process fee. Mr. Sanjeev Sebharwal enters appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 1.
Issue fresh notice to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 on the petitioner taking steps within one week. Counter affidavits be filed by the respondents with an advance copy to the petitioner, who may file rejoinder thereto, if any, within two weeks thereof.
Renotify on 6th March, 2019.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J
JANUARY 10, 2019 bh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Namrata Solanki & Ors
Union of India & Ors
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
