No issues. Order where the Court held the writ petition does not survive due to an order by MHA implementing a prior judgment in Dev Sharma case and disposed of the pending petition and application accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
HANS RAJ ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Samir Malik, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms. Barkha Babbar, Advocate for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 03.09.2019
1.This petition does not survive in view of the order dated 19th August, 2019 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India, implementing the judgment of this Court dated 31st January, 2019 passed in Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of India (2019) 174 DRJ 98 (DB).
S.MURALIDHAR, J
TALWANT SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 rd
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of IndiaExplained¶6
_Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of India (2019) 174 DRJ 98 (DB)._
HANS RAJ
UNION OF INDIA
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
S.MURALIDHAR and TALWANT SINGH
Parties & counsel
