The High Court of Delhi disposed of the pending writ petition and stay application, holding that the matter no longer survives due to a Government Order dated August 19, 2019, implementing the Court's previous judgment in Dev Sharma.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Khanna, GP & Mr. Ram Krishan Kumar, Advocates for Respondents No.1 to 3
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
O R D E R % 03.09.2019
1.This petition does not survive in view of the order dated 19th August, 2019 issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), Government of India, implementing the judgment of this Court dated 31st January, 2019 passed in Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of India (2019) 174 DRJ 98 (DB).
S.MURALIDHAR, J
TALWANT SINGH, J
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019/rd
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of IndiaReferred¶9
Dev Sharma, Dy. Comdt. ITBP v Union of India (2019) 174 DRJ 98 (DB)
Sat Paul
Union of India
S.Muralidhar
Talwant Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
